When Parliament's corruption is the issue, this is not how to fight the BNP
It's not often you see my favourite UK left of centre blog, Harry's Place, put up posts praising the Tories, but here's David T positively gushing over the newly established anti-BNP site established by Tim Montgomerie's ConservativeHome group and allies.
Much as I would love to see this campaign succeed, and much as I admire the fact that people like Tim Montgomerie have been able to galvanise Tories & others to support this campaign, I think the first video is pretty dismal.
It offers an image of a sweet-looking Afro-Caribbean boy to counter the BNP's propaganda that our troubles are caused by supposedly unlimited immigration and their taking of our resources by people who shouldn't have the right to them. Behind the BNP's racist message is also the conviction that shadowy and corrupt Hidden Hands (yes, that's Jews like me) are behind all of this.
I don't think this approach is going to persuade a single potential BNP voter to cast their vote differently.
For a start, it insults the intelligence of the target audience, something I'd have thought media-savvy people like Tim Montgomerie are intensely aware of.
Non racist potential BNP protest voters are perfectly aware that there are very likeable people amongst the ethnic groups that are its targets. Doesn't stop them from voting for the BNP as a protest against the perceived corruption of mainstream parliamentarians, or as a protest against particular forms of maximalist minority group critiques of mainstream society (as promoted by the Hizb and the Saviour Sect).
Back in the days preceding the Nazi success in the German elections, the angry non-fascists who voted for them in 1933 mostly knew quite a few cuddly Jewish children, or dedicated Jewish doctors and the like. Some of them had close Jewish friends. All this didn't prevent them from voting against the existing traditional parties, because they thought drastic action was needed, and they didn't see anything wrong with being against Jews as a whole whilst simultaneously being very fond of the odd Jew.
Many otherwise sane and reasonable Palestinians voted for the atrocious Hamas and their exterminationist propaganda as a protest against the corruption of Fatah. They were perfectly well aware of what Hamas stood for, and they supported the two state solution, but their anger with Fatah overcame their real political convictions, because they felt they had to "do something" and bring the corruption to an end.
Non-racists who consider voting for BNP as a protest also know that if they send a few BNP MEPs to the EU Parliament and elect a few BNP councils, they will never have the power to affect the actual lives and conditions of ethnic minorities in this country. So they feel they can safely use the BNP to register a protest, or, as with non-ideology driven Palestinian Hamas voters, to take action against corruption whilst forgetting all about the baggage that comes with the protest party.
So what sort of video message might help persuade decent, ordinary people not to cast a protest vote for the BNP? Maybe something that recognises the justice of widespread public anger-- and then puts across the message that the answer to corruption isn't to cast a vote for racism, anymore than a vote for out-and-out terrorism was the answer to Fatah's corruption.
Maybe it should be a "your vote matters" video. Maybe it should show what happens to countries and peoples who cast despair votes for totalitarian and racist parties, and then contrast that with countries where the electorate took some action that voted the corrupt out (Japan?).
A video which put across the message "when you want to stop corruption, don't vote for violent criminals" would enlighten the many potential voters who don't know about the BNP's track record of convictions for appalling offences.
Most of all, all of us who are committed to the mainstream left and right parties need to put all the pressure we can on our party leaderships to come to terms with what we the people feel, and make really radical moves now that will begin to shift the public's perceptions.
Sadly, there's too much evidence that Brown and his circle, even the ministers who despair of him, are virtually incapable of radically changing their direction and stopping the corruption--and its leaders in the form of the guardians of the parliamentary expenses system right now.
Cameron made something of a move, and it has had an impact, but it's nothing like enough. Listening to Hague on BBC R4 Today programme, it's clear that the Tory hierarchy still haven't got it. He's just pushing the latest Tory line of chipping away at the bits that suit them (like the communication allowance) whilst claiming the public don't really care about the Speaker and the corrupt Parliamentary apparatus that enabled the MPs and the Lords build up their sense of entitlement to be above the laws that the rest of us live by, and line their pockets accordingly, whilst chorusing "it's all within the rules".
If you don't want people to vote BNP:
Ensure that the Speaker of Parliament resigns immediately by organizing a whipped vote of no confidence.
Sack all the members of the Parliamentary Privileges Committee and the senior staff of the Fees Office.
Only MPs with impeccable expenses claims records to sit on the Committee in future.
All MPs to place itemised expenses claims on their web sites every three months.
All claims going back to 2005 to be scrutinised by senior HM Revenue & Customs to check that they meet the test of "wholly, necessarily and exclusively" for use in their job as MPs. Claims that don't meet the test to be paid back in full and with penalty fines and interest.
Commit to prosecuting all MPs who knowingly made false claims or submitted improper accounting.
Commit to reducing the number of MPs by half in time for the next election. If practically impossible for boundary commission reasons, commit to having a second election as soon as possible after 2010 to elect the lower number of MPs
All sitting MPs to face reselection meetings with their constituency parties within the next two weeks (ie ahead of the June elections)
Legislation to be passed immediately to enable peers who breach laws on corruption to be stripped of their titles and rights to sit in the House of Lords.
Any major party that committed to that could face down challenges from the BNP and other fringe parties.
Anything else is tokenism and papering over the cracks. And it won't wash with the electorate. Those who are minded to vote BNP will still do so.
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d36869e201156f93ef74970c
Well said and I for one totally agree with the singular exception rearding the analogy with the Palestinian Arabs of Gaza.
It is well documented that many were 'urged' to vote for Hamas at the point of a gun. I'm sure that the average PA just wants o live a peaceful lifeand bring up their kids in peace and safety.
I've often wondered though why this group of professional 'refugees' dont simply emigrate to the likes of Jordan (created at the same time as Israel and grabbed the area on the west bank)and Egypt (whose territorial land-grab of 1948)created the ghetto of the Gaza Strip. The PA I'm afraid are hostages to their Umma in the ME.
Angus, the reputable polling shows that the clear majority of the Palis are nowhere near willing to live and let live with the Israelis.
Other than that, Adlo's contribution was spot on. From my perch in Deepest Amerika, the high-minded Brit left's hair-up-ass with the BNP smacks of the Weimar good socialist thugs who delighted in street brawling with the evil fascist thugs, until it became more convenient to simply move over to their side.
HPH The Palestinian Arabs are now into the third generation of dupes of the world wide afilliations Islamists who will ceaselessly drive towards the anihilation of the state of Israel.
Hamas in particular rails against the PLO (now known as Fatah) and the legitimised Palstinian Authority which favoured a two state solution.
Fatah was ousted by force from Gaza by Hamas paramilitaries. The every-day average Joe/Mo I maintain, even if they only have half a brain between them, wants to live in peace. However peace is the last thing the Islamists want. The 'Palestinians' plight, is their tethered goat. Without this common cause*, the so called unity of purpose of the creation of a global Caliphate(* a rare comodity amongst the Arabs throughout hisory)would be non-existant or a least extremely difficult.
True true true. But the polling numbers still say that the Palis would rather not have a state at all, rather than to peaceably accept a permanently-Jewish Israel next door. Check out the interview with the so-called Pali ambassador to Lebanon which appeared on Melanie Phillips's blog yesterday.
"Commit to reducing the number of MPs by half in time for the next election."
That would only work if you ended the tradition of constituency MPs, of MPs being available to people in their constituencies, holding surgeries, being expected to live in their constituencies, etc. Which might not be a bad thing. To be honest, we could save even more money by doing away with constituencies altogether (no more need for the Boundary Commission). Have MPs elected by PR from regional lists. Then we could slash the number in half easily.
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Well said and I for one totally agree with the singular exception rearding the analogy with the Palestinian Arabs of Gaza.
It is well documented that many were 'urged' to vote for Hamas at the point of a gun. I'm sure that the average PA just wants o live a peaceful lifeand bring up their kids in peace and safety.
I've often wondered though why this group of professional 'refugees' dont simply emigrate to the likes of Jordan (created at the same time as Israel and grabbed the area on the west bank)and Egypt (whose territorial land-grab of 1948)created the ghetto of the Gaza Strip. The PA I'm afraid are hostages to their Umma in the ME.
Posted by: Angus | May 15, 2009 at 12:38 PM
I wonder whether there's a danger of the main parties so losing respect, that they collapse.
Perhaps not now, but at some point.
Posted by: David T | May 15, 2009 at 01:51 PM
Angus, the reputable polling shows that the clear majority of the Palis are nowhere near willing to live and let live with the Israelis.
Other than that, Adlo's contribution was spot on. From my perch in Deepest Amerika, the high-minded Brit left's hair-up-ass with the BNP smacks of the Weimar good socialist thugs who delighted in street brawling with the evil fascist thugs, until it became more convenient to simply move over to their side.
Posted by: Hanoi Paris Hilton | May 15, 2009 at 06:27 PM
HPH The Palestinian Arabs are now into the third generation of dupes of the world wide afilliations Islamists who will ceaselessly drive towards the anihilation of the state of Israel.
Hamas in particular rails against the PLO (now known as Fatah) and the legitimised Palstinian Authority which favoured a two state solution.
Fatah was ousted by force from Gaza by Hamas paramilitaries. The every-day average Joe/Mo I maintain, even if they only have half a brain between them, wants to live in peace. However peace is the last thing the Islamists want. The 'Palestinians' plight, is their tethered goat. Without this common cause*, the so called unity of purpose of the creation of a global Caliphate(* a rare comodity amongst the Arabs throughout hisory)would be non-existant or a least extremely difficult.
Posted by: Angus | May 15, 2009 at 07:38 PM
True true true. But the polling numbers still say that the Palis would rather not have a state at all, rather than to peaceably accept a permanently-Jewish Israel next door. Check out the interview with the so-called Pali ambassador to Lebanon which appeared on Melanie Phillips's blog yesterday.
Posted by: Hanoi Paris Hilton | May 16, 2009 at 04:20 AM
"Commit to reducing the number of MPs by half in time for the next election."
That would only work if you ended the tradition of constituency MPs, of MPs being available to people in their constituencies, holding surgeries, being expected to live in their constituencies, etc. Which might not be a bad thing. To be honest, we could save even more money by doing away with constituencies altogether (no more need for the Boundary Commission). Have MPs elected by PR from regional lists. Then we could slash the number in half easily.
Posted by: Sol Walsh | May 20, 2009 at 11:29 PM