Useful web sites

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    « Still shameless after all these years | Main | Encountering the world of Goth »

    Comments

    Don Radlauer

    I'm very skeptical about Debka's "record of scoops on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Middle East conflicts". It's easy to accumulate such a "record" if you're willing to print any rumor that comes your way: some of the rumors are bound to be correct, and you can take credit for a "scoop" because you didn't take the time that more responsible media outlets take to verify your facts and sources.

    Debka has gotten some stories right; but they've also gotten a lot of stories egregiously wrong, and they never (at least to my knowledge) publish retractions when their stories turn out to be untrue.

    I just followed your link to read what Debka had to say about Sa'adat and Barghouti - and I couldn't find any mention of them in the article about the impending Palestinian cabinet. Needless to say, I didn't find any statement regarding a previous, incorrect version of the story!

    In short: I would suggest reading Debka only as an indicator of interesting possibilities, not as a genuine news outlet. More often than not, their predictions turn out to be wildly false.


    Addendum: Debka also has the rather disreputable habit of repackaging material from open (or semi-open) sources such as Janes as if they came from "our correspondents" - implying that Debka has all kinds of highly-placed sources and analysts that in fact consist of subscriptions to other publications. These "correspondents" plus a few people who use Debka to publicize rumors and speculations that nobody else would touch constitute most of Debka's "reporting staff".

    The comments to this entry are closed.

    August 2015

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
                1
    2 3 4 5 6 7 8
    9 10 11 12 13 14 15
    16 17 18 19 20 21 22
    23 24 25 26 27 28 29
    30 31          
    Blog powered by Typepad